ARCHITECTURE COMPARISON
DENSE//i64
Why brute-forcing compute is no longer the answer — and how integer-first, token-routed architectures change the equation.
1.5B
Parameters (Pacific-i64)
10K
Safety contrastive pairs
3
Peer-reviewed papers
CC BY-NC
Open-source license
// THE CASE FOR i64
Three problems. Three solutions.
DENSE
Every token passes through the full MLP — wasted compute on irrelevant activations.
Token-Routed MLP
i64
Deterministic routing selects only the relevant MLP paths per token. Less compute, same expressivity.
DENSE
Standard optimizers with fixed learning rates — unstable training at scale.
Mu-Guided Dynamics
i64
PID-inspired control mechanism adapts dynamics during training. Stable convergence by design.
DENSE
Generic CUDA kernels not optimized for transformer workloads.
CGGR Kernels
i64
Custom kernels fused for i64 operations. Lower memory bandwidth, higher throughput.
// GET STARTED
Try it on the demo
Run i64 models directly in your browser. Compare outputs, latency, and token routing against dense baselines in real time.